Thursday, August 09, 2012
Friday, August 03, 2012
Culture Shmulture - Wherein Romney Gets it Wrong
Romney recently made the following comments (via ForeignPolicy)
During my recent trip to Israel, I had suggested that the choices a society makes about its culture play a role in creating prosperity, and that the significant disparity between Israeli and Palestinian living standards was powerfully influenced by it. In some quarters, that comment became the subject of controversy.
But what exactly accounts for prosperity if not culture? In the case of the United States, it is a particular kind of culture that has made us the greatest economic power in the history of the earth. Many significant features come to mind: our work ethic, our appreciation for education, our willingness to take risks, our commitment to honor and oath, our family orientation, our devotion to a purpose greater than ourselves, our patriotism. But one feature of our culture that propels the American economy stands out above all others: freedom. The American economy is fueled by freedom. Free people and their free enterprises are what drive our economic vitality.While better than a candidate who doesn't really understand or believe in entrepreneurs and markets as drivers of change and economic opportunity and wealth (WashingtonPost), I'd have to disagree in the strongest possible terms with Mr. Romney. It isn't "American" to believe in the pursuit of liberty and freedom - and ironically in recent years, Americans have been less than staunch defenders of free enterprise and personal liberties. No these aren't values specific to Americans - they're values humanity shares. Wherein Fareed Zakaria gets it right (Washington Post):
Had Romney spent more time reading Milton Friedman, he would have realized that historically the key driver for economic growth has been the adoption of capitalism and its related institutions and policies across diverse cultures.
The link between economic policies and performance can be seen even in the country on which Romney was lavishing praise. Israel had many admirable traits in its early decades, but no one would have called it an economic miracle. Its economy was highly statist. Things changed in the 1990s with market-oriented reforms — initiated by Benyamin Netanyahu — and sound monetary policies. As a result, Israel’s economy grew much faster than it had in the 1980s. The miracle Romney was praising had to do with new policies rather than deep culture.
Ironically, the argument that culture is central to a country’s success has been used most frequently by Asian strongmen to argue that their countries need not adopt Western-style democracy. Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew has made this case passionately for decades. It is an odd claim, because Singapore’s own success would seem to contradict it. It is not so different from neighboring Malaysia. The crucial difference is that Singapore had extremely good leadership that pursued good economic policies with relentless discipline.
Posted by Clement Wan at 10:25 AM 0 comments
Labels: development, economics, politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)